iPadre Catholic Podcast show!

I was interviewed on this wonderful podcast show on the topic of Sedevacantism. Father Jay and I went over a number of very important topics in examining the Protestant movement of Sedevacantism. We cover the New Mass, the argument of the past Popes being Freemasons, Vatican II, the Papacy, and so much more! It's a very in depth conversation on a VERY IMPORTANT topic. As Father Jay asked me I have provided a link below to a large library of responses I have made against Sedevacantism. Below are a number of links to Youtube videos done refuting Sedevacantism, and then below you will find links to two VERY important debates done defending the Novus Ordo Missae against the claims of Sedevacantism. Provided here also is a live talk I gave on THE NEW MASS.

GOD BLESS!



GOD does not lie: Refuting Sedevacantism


Examining Titus 3 through the Fathers


New Mass and Union of the Faithful


the Council of Florence and the Form of the Eucharist


Defending the Vatican/Lutheran Agreement


The New Mass was not influenced by Protestantism


Refuting Sedevacantist Objections


Sedevacantism: Another Protestant Denomination


The Council of Trent Refutes Sedevacantism


A talk on the Validity of the New Mass

RIGHT CLICK and SAVE AS to download!


Peter Dimond vs. William Albrecht

the Validity of the New Mass

RIGHT CLICK AND SAVE AS to DOWNLOAD!


Right click to save the debate vs. Ken Bird on the Validity of the New Mass below!

Opening Speeches

Part II

Part III

Part IV

Part V

Part VI

Part VII

Part VIII

Part IX

Ken's Closing Statements

William's Closing Statements and Conclusion of the Debate


HAVE A BLESSED HOLY DAY Season knowing that we DO have a Papacy and we DO have a true Church! GOD BLESS you and don't hold back your love this wondrous season!

Images, Statues, Icons--a debate!

I'll be debating Turretinfan of Alpha and Omega Ministries on December the 2nd on a very important topic! For all those interested, stay tuned to the Legate home page or follow me on my Youtube page for more on the debate!

Debate in Texas on Marian Dogmas

Was Vatican I correct?

This debate was an interesting one! Was Vatican I Correct Regarding Papal Infallibility?

Over 2 hours of debating and intense cross ex!

It was great!

Click below to download the debate, absolutely free!

Was Vatican I correct regarding Papal Infallibility?

Patrick Henry Omlor and silly argumentation

Florence "solemnly" decreed the form of consecration? No. Sedevacantists argue that? Silly? Yes and Yes! Refuted? Thoroughly.

Here's hoping the falsely called traditionalists can dig up better argumentation.

Watch this video analysis here!

Dimond Brothers and Debating

Robert Godfrey, who runs the Sedevacantist Printing Card Company in Corpus Christi, Texas has asked me why Peter Dimond pulled out of a future possible debate on the Validity of Vatican II against me.

I recently did a video on this very issue, but I thought it best to provide the images here as well. Mr. Dimond, after our debate on the New Mass, made a number of demands in order for a debate on Vatican II to happen. It is my conviction that Mr. Dimond put so many obstacles in the way of a future debate against me simply due to his awful performance in our previous debate on the New Mass. After that debate Mr. Dimond even went as far as to setting up a ridiculous amount of parameters in order for another debate to occur! Mr. Dimond's outrageous behavior led numerous Sedevacantists to APOLOGIZE for his behavior. As such, it seems that Mr. Dimond...










WOULD like to debate, but when it's "convenient" for him! Mr. Dimond also wants "SOLE YOUTUBE RIGHTS" to this future debate. He wants to be the ONLY one who can post it.

You think that's outrageous..I'm not done ;)











Keep watching...













What's the big DELETED that is circled there. Well, Mr. Dimond also says that I have to agree that if any comments I make in the debate that he deems NECESSARY to be "DELETED", then he gets the right to DELETE them from the debate!

Mr. Dimond doesn't want a debate. Mr. Dimond wants a puppet that he can manipulate to his own liking. After Mr. Dimond and the Monastery's numerous awful performances, we aren't surprised that they set up SO many OUTRAGEOUS demands. The Monastery KNOW that no one would accept such outrageous demands. As such, it's an easy way to avoid defending your position that has been refuted many times over already.

New Mass Debate MP3

Download the New Mass Debate below!

the Validity of the New Mass Debate

The following is a debate between Ken Bird, who aligns himself with the CMRI position and William Albrecht. Ken Bird is a Sedevacantist and takes the position that the New Mass is invalid. William Albrecht is a Catholic apologist and takes the position that the New Mass IS valid. It is recommended you download the Validity of the New Mass Debate with Dimond vs. Albrecht if you haven't heard this debate first. That was the debate that caused Peter Dimond to inadvertently reject statements from Trent and the Church Fathers! This debate takes a completely different course and is a more fruitful-charitable dialogue. To download the complete debate right click and save the files below.

Right click to download the debate on this same topic vs. Peter Dimond below.

Peter Dimond vs. William Albrecht on the Validity of the Novus Ordo Missae MP3!

Right click to save the debate vs. Ken Bird on the Validity of the New Mass below!

Opening Speeches

Debate Section II

Debate Section III

Debate Section IV

Debate Section V

Debate Section VI

Debate Section VII

Debate Section VIII

Debate Section IX

Ken's Closing Statements

William's Closing Statements