I would be hard pressed to convince if I were told that this one book would change my studies and help enhance my love for the written Word of GOD. I would find it difficult to believe if told that this one compendium would be a must own and have its place right in my library as one of my go to books. As it turns out, I have been made a believer. After having read much about this edition well before its release, and after having owned the 26th edition, I was wondering if the changes would warrant a purchase, considering its steep price. I chose to take the plunge and purchase the Novum Testamentum Graece edition with Dictionary. The Institute for New Testament Textual Research in Münster has done a masterful job in this publication. I honestly cannot wait for this to be fully available in certain online Bible softwares! My review, unfortunately, will not cover the differences in the 28th and the 27th edition(as some people have requested that I do) for the simple reason that I never owned the 27th edition and don’t intend to purchase it just to read through it and review the newer edition in comparison to the older edition.
Manuscript Tradition:
The sheer richness of the Church’s tradition in regards to preserving the Word of GOD is highlighted wonderfully in this scholarly edition. A tiny little treasure trove placed directly between the front hard cover and first page is a tiny little pamphlet like insert that covers the consistently cited Witnesses along with the Signs and Abbreviations. Here you will see the sheer enormity of cited manuscripts as well as getting a general feel for the Greek Witnesses, of which I found particular interest was in the Book of Revelation. Anyone familiar with my recent debate on the Reality of the Enduring Torment and Suffering of Hell will realize that I cited quite a bit from this ancient Commentary.
Inside this new edition, we are treated to a gorgeous list of abbreviations of Church Fathers whose Patristic citations are employed when necessary, and of course, when relevant. One can’t help but appreciate the magnitude of riches bestowed upon us:
Basil of Caesarea, the Great Augustine, the Venerable Bede, the Giant Athanasius, Clement, John Chrysostom, the Golden Mouthed, Gregory of Nyssa, the Legendary Irenaeus, Justin the Martyr, the at times unorthodox Origen..and many many more. We’re even treated to relevant abbreviations from Pelagius and Marcion(as cited in Tertullian, Epiphanius, and Adamantius), a real treat for the student or even scholar of pastristic studies!
The Greek Text, a glorious example:
Titus 2:13 προσδεχόμενοι τὴν μακαρίαν ἐλπίδα καὶ ἐπιφάνειαν τῆς δόξης τοῦ μεγάλου θεοῦ καὶ σωτῆρος ἡμῶν Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ
Rendered best in the English
Titus 2:13 while we wait for the blessed hope and the manifestation of the glory of our great God and Savior, Jesus Christ.
The Patristic giants always interpreted this passage in an orthodox manner:
Chrysostom: And Paul said: “from whom is the Christ according to the flesh, who is over all things, God blessed forever, Amen.”18 And again: “No fornicator or covetous one has an inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and God.”19 And still again: “through the appearance of our great God and Savior Jesus Christ.” And John calls him by the same name of God when he says: “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God; and the Word was God.”20
On the Incomprehensible Nature of God 5.2.21
The Dictionary Edition:
The 28th edition that I am reviewing is the one that comes with an extensive Greek dictionary connected with the historical text of the New Testament. A whole book in and of itself, anyone serious in Biblical studies really should purchase this! Running at 220 full pages, we can spend a whole evening reading along and familiarizing ourselves with the words that GOD chose to use in bringing about his glorious message. Anyone with a cursory understanding of Greek would greatly benefit from this extensive dictionary, and anyone quite familiar with the language can expect to get a great brush up when covering words that they no doubt don't encounter very often. Highly recommended!
Friday, October 25, 2013
Sunday, January 6, 2013
Debating the Canon in 2013!
For anyone that missed yesterday's show, my good friend and host Agustin has gotten this show along with MANY others archived!
Tune in here!
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/healingxjws/2013/01/05/btr-canon-debate-is-the-deuterocanonapocrypha-gods-word
You can download it, load it to your phone, iPhone, iPod, or any listening to device! I thank GOD for such a lively and engaging debate! We had numerous callers(unfortunately NOT enough time for all callers..as is the case with all debates/shows)--but I look forward to hopefully touching upon this topic again!
For anyone that would like to hear our first debate on this issue, I debate Aomin's Turretinfan on this very same topic in 2011 in this MP3 below! You can download it and hear this first debate here!
http://www.4shared.com/mp3/YTF3TN-W/Turretinfan-Albrecht_-_Canon_D.html?
And here is the link to yesterday's show! I was notified by the radio host that he had a record amount of listeners for this live radio debate! Blessings to GOD that people are interested enough to hear and learn about the Word of GOD!
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE DEUTEROCANON DEBATE, THE FIRST OF 2013!
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/healingxjws/2013/01/05/btr-canon-debate-is-the-deuterocanonapocrypha-gods-word
You can download it, load it to your phone, iPhone, iPod, or any listening to device! I thank GOD for such a lively and engaging debate! We had numerous callers(unfortunately NOT enough time for all callers..as is the case with all debates/shows)--but I look forward to hopefully touching upon this topic again!
For anyone that would like to hear our first debate on this issue, I debate Aomin's Turretinfan on this very same topic in 2011 in this MP3 below! You can download it and hear this first debate here!
http://www.4shared.com/mp3/YTF3TN-W/Turretinfan-Albrecht_-_Canon_D.html?
And here is the link to yesterday's show! I was notified by the radio host that he had a record amount of listeners for this live radio debate! Blessings to GOD that people are interested enough to hear and learn about the Word of GOD!
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE DEUTEROCANON DEBATE, THE FIRST OF 2013!
Thursday, December 20, 2012
New Year! New projects! New debates!
Will be having the Deuterocanon Debate this upcoming New Year and eleven others!
Looking forward to it!
Will be uploading interviews and the downloadable mp3s via the site http://www.opendrive.com
Wednesday, September 12, 2012
Winter Canon Debate!
Very excited about this! On live radio!
Sorry for my absence in posting! I have been at work HARD teaching the faith and working on a few books that will be published soon!
GOD BLESS everyone!
Thursday, April 12, 2012
Logos Bible Software for Catholics- GIVEAWAY!
William Albrecht and Logos Bible Software are thrilled to announce a Catholic Library contest giveaway! All you have to do is ENTER it and you might be the lucky one drawn in a few weeks as the winner of over 150 amazing resources, including the writings of the Church Fathers, the Catechism, Early Church Documents, Scriptural Commentaries, The works of the Great St. Thomas Aquinas, Denzinger’s Sources of Catholic Dogma, Various Bibes, including Greek and Latin! That's really not it, you'll also get Greek, Hebrew, and Latin Lexicons, and SO MUCH MORE! Over 150 incredible resources, worth over $2,700 in print! It's ALL FREE! Just enter and you could be the lucky one!
Sunday, April 1, 2012
LOGOS Bible Software..for Catholics!
I recently had an amazing interview with Catholic Director from Logos Andrew Jones--you can find the interview here, as well as a link to the MP3 below! Get their products! Support them! I will be running a Contest very soon from my Youtube page, my Blog, and the Legate site! Details coming soon!

Youtube Video Interview with Logos Bible Software! Click to listen, to hear all the great products and amazing Biblical works you can find with Logos!
Right click and SAVE as, to download the Mp3 interview!

Youtube Video Interview with Logos Bible Software! Click to listen, to hear all the great products and amazing Biblical works you can find with Logos!
Right click and SAVE as, to download the Mp3 interview!
Saturday, March 17, 2012
It's been a while!
It's been a while since I have updated this! I have so many projects going on! Those that follow my blog must forgive me-I put more time into my books I am working on to publish, my talks, and my formal debates. I will try to update my blog more often!
I must admit..as I said previously..blogging really isn't my thing. I most likely will only update this blog with links of new mp3s, videos, etc. etc.
Keep your eyes open for a few new MP3s I will be posting, including an interview with LOGOS BIBLE SOFTWARE on great things coming soon! I will be posting that MP3 I had with the amazing Andrew soon! GOD BLESS and stay Catholic..and if you're not Catholic yet--study the faith, it's the only way to go ;)
-William
I must admit..as I said previously..blogging really isn't my thing. I most likely will only update this blog with links of new mp3s, videos, etc. etc.
Keep your eyes open for a few new MP3s I will be posting, including an interview with LOGOS BIBLE SOFTWARE on great things coming soon! I will be posting that MP3 I had with the amazing Andrew soon! GOD BLESS and stay Catholic..and if you're not Catholic yet--study the faith, it's the only way to go ;)
-William
Tuesday, April 19, 2011
Two mp3 debate sets posted and more!
I apologize for the delay in posting the DID ST. AUGUSTINE BELIEVE IN TRANSUBSTANTIATION debate mp3 earlier--but here it is below!
As usual, I try my best to keep all my debate audios(unless the recording company--the instance that happened in my SIRI DEBATE in Corpus-- prevents me to release it freely!) around for people to hear and get something out of them! It's ALL for the GLORY OF OUR GREAT GOD and SAVIOR!
Left click to go to the page to download the MP3!
Did. St. Augustine Believe in Transubstantiation?
And now, the latest debate(the MP3s are finally posted!), which was on Purgatory is freely available also!

Do the Scriptures and the Fathers Teach Purgatory?
Below, LEFT click on each link to follow a link that allows you to download the COMPLETE debate in PARTS!
NOTE: My closing had to be re-recorded due to technical difficulties. NO WORDS were changed. This was done from permission by Turretinfan and the moderator, Matt Lankford.
Part One: My Opening Statement
Part Two: My Opening Statement Continued
Part Three: Turretinfan's Opening Statement
Part Four: Turretinfan's Opening Statement Continued
Part Five: Turretinfan Cross Examines Albrecht
Part Six: Albrecht Cross Examines Turretinfan
Part Seven: Turretinfan RE-Cross Examines Albrecht
Part Eight: Albrecht RE-Cross Examines Turretinfan
Part Nine: Turretinfan Closing Statement
Part Ten: Albrecht Closing Statement and the Conclusion of the Debate
Enjoy!
Upcoming Debates and Dates soon to be posted!
Marian Dogmas Debate vs. Robert Zins and Sacraments Debate vs. Robert Zins
Three Sedevacantist Debates set also!
GOD BLESS!
As usual, I try my best to keep all my debate audios(unless the recording company--the instance that happened in my SIRI DEBATE in Corpus-- prevents me to release it freely!) around for people to hear and get something out of them! It's ALL for the GLORY OF OUR GREAT GOD and SAVIOR!
Left click to go to the page to download the MP3!
Did. St. Augustine Believe in Transubstantiation?
And now, the latest debate(the MP3s are finally posted!), which was on Purgatory is freely available also!

Do the Scriptures and the Fathers Teach Purgatory?
Below, LEFT click on each link to follow a link that allows you to download the COMPLETE debate in PARTS!
NOTE: My closing had to be re-recorded due to technical difficulties. NO WORDS were changed. This was done from permission by Turretinfan and the moderator, Matt Lankford.
Part One: My Opening Statement
Part Two: My Opening Statement Continued
Part Three: Turretinfan's Opening Statement
Part Four: Turretinfan's Opening Statement Continued
Part Five: Turretinfan Cross Examines Albrecht
Part Six: Albrecht Cross Examines Turretinfan
Part Seven: Turretinfan RE-Cross Examines Albrecht
Part Eight: Albrecht RE-Cross Examines Turretinfan
Part Nine: Turretinfan Closing Statement
Part Ten: Albrecht Closing Statement and the Conclusion of the Debate
Enjoy!
Upcoming Debates and Dates soon to be posted!
Marian Dogmas Debate vs. Robert Zins and Sacraments Debate vs. Robert Zins
Three Sedevacantist Debates set also!
GOD BLESS!
Saturday, February 5, 2011
St. Augustine and the Eucharist
Did St. Augustine Believe in Transubstantiation?
Clearly! Whether or not Augustine used the word(which he did NOT) is not relevant to the subject. What is of importance in this debate is whether or not Augustine believed that the bread and the wine changed once the words of prayer were said over them, which is in essence what transubtantiation is! The MP3 for the debate will be available soon!
Clearly! Whether or not Augustine used the word(which he did NOT) is not relevant to the subject. What is of importance in this debate is whether or not Augustine believed that the bread and the wine changed once the words of prayer were said over them, which is in essence what transubtantiation is! The MP3 for the debate will be available soon!
Wednesday, December 15, 2010
iPadre Catholic Podcast show!

I was interviewed on this wonderful podcast show on the topic of Sedevacantism. Father Jay and I went over a number of very important topics in examining the Protestant movement of Sedevacantism. We cover the New Mass, the argument of the past Popes being Freemasons, Vatican II, the Papacy, and so much more! It's a very in depth conversation on a VERY IMPORTANT topic. As Father Jay asked me I have provided a link below to a large library of responses I have made against Sedevacantism. Below are a number of links to Youtube videos done refuting Sedevacantism, and then below you will find links to two VERY important debates done defending the Novus Ordo Missae against the claims of Sedevacantism. Provided here also is a live talk I gave on THE NEW MASS.
GOD BLESS!
GOD does not lie: Refuting Sedevacantism
Examining Titus 3 through the Fathers
New Mass and Union of the Faithful
the Council of Florence and the Form of the Eucharist
Defending the Vatican/Lutheran Agreement
The New Mass was not influenced by Protestantism
Refuting Sedevacantist Objections
Sedevacantism: Another Protestant Denomination
The Council of Trent Refutes Sedevacantism
A talk on the Validity of the New Mass
RIGHT CLICK and SAVE AS to download!
Peter Dimond vs. William Albrecht
the Validity of the New Mass
RIGHT CLICK AND SAVE AS to DOWNLOAD!
Right click to save the debate vs. Ken Bird on the Validity of the New Mass below!
Opening Speeches
Part II
Part III
Part IV
Part V
Part VI
Part VII
Part VIII
Part IX
Ken's Closing Statements
William's Closing Statements and Conclusion of the Debate
HAVE A BLESSED HOLY DAY Season knowing that we DO have a Papacy and we DO have a true Church! GOD BLESS you and don't hold back your love this wondrous season!
Monday, November 22, 2010
Images, Statues, Icons--a debate!
Wednesday, October 27, 2010
Saturday, October 23, 2010
Was Vatican I correct?

This debate was an interesting one! Was Vatican I Correct Regarding Papal Infallibility?
Over 2 hours of debating and intense cross ex!
It was great!
Click below to download the debate, absolutely free!
Was Vatican I correct regarding Papal Infallibility?
Thursday, April 22, 2010
Patrick Henry Omlor and silly argumentation

Florence "solemnly" decreed the form of consecration? No. Sedevacantists argue that? Silly? Yes and Yes! Refuted? Thoroughly.
Here's hoping the falsely called traditionalists can dig up better argumentation.
Watch this video analysis here!
Tuesday, April 20, 2010
Dimond Brothers and Debating
Robert Godfrey, who runs the Sedevacantist Printing Card Company in Corpus Christi, Texas has asked me why Peter Dimond pulled out of a future possible debate on the Validity of Vatican II against me.
I recently did a video on this very issue, but I thought it best to provide the images here as well. Mr. Dimond, after our debate on the New Mass, made a number of demands in order for a debate on Vatican II to happen. It is my conviction that Mr. Dimond put so many obstacles in the way of a future debate against me simply due to his awful performance in our previous debate on the New Mass. After that debate Mr. Dimond even went as far as to setting up a ridiculous amount of parameters in order for another debate to occur! Mr. Dimond's outrageous behavior led numerous Sedevacantists to APOLOGIZE for his behavior. As such, it seems that Mr. Dimond...

WOULD like to debate, but when it's "convenient" for him! Mr. Dimond also wants "SOLE YOUTUBE RIGHTS" to this future debate. He wants to be the ONLY one who can post it.
You think that's outrageous..I'm not done ;)

Keep watching...

What's the big DELETED that is circled there. Well, Mr. Dimond also says that I have to agree that if any comments I make in the debate that he deems NECESSARY to be "DELETED", then he gets the right to DELETE them from the debate!
Mr. Dimond doesn't want a debate. Mr. Dimond wants a puppet that he can manipulate to his own liking. After Mr. Dimond and the Monastery's numerous awful performances, we aren't surprised that they set up SO many OUTRAGEOUS demands. The Monastery KNOW that no one would accept such outrageous demands. As such, it's an easy way to avoid defending your position that has been refuted many times over already.
I recently did a video on this very issue, but I thought it best to provide the images here as well. Mr. Dimond, after our debate on the New Mass, made a number of demands in order for a debate on Vatican II to happen. It is my conviction that Mr. Dimond put so many obstacles in the way of a future debate against me simply due to his awful performance in our previous debate on the New Mass. After that debate Mr. Dimond even went as far as to setting up a ridiculous amount of parameters in order for another debate to occur! Mr. Dimond's outrageous behavior led numerous Sedevacantists to APOLOGIZE for his behavior. As such, it seems that Mr. Dimond...
WOULD like to debate, but when it's "convenient" for him! Mr. Dimond also wants "SOLE YOUTUBE RIGHTS" to this future debate. He wants to be the ONLY one who can post it.
You think that's outrageous..I'm not done ;)
Keep watching...
What's the big DELETED that is circled there. Well, Mr. Dimond also says that I have to agree that if any comments I make in the debate that he deems NECESSARY to be "DELETED", then he gets the right to DELETE them from the debate!
Mr. Dimond doesn't want a debate. Mr. Dimond wants a puppet that he can manipulate to his own liking. After Mr. Dimond and the Monastery's numerous awful performances, we aren't surprised that they set up SO many OUTRAGEOUS demands. The Monastery KNOW that no one would accept such outrageous demands. As such, it's an easy way to avoid defending your position that has been refuted many times over already.
New Mass Debate MP3

Download the New Mass Debate below!
the Validity of the New Mass Debate
The following is a debate between Ken Bird, who aligns himself with the CMRI position and William Albrecht. Ken Bird is a Sedevacantist and takes the position that the New Mass is invalid. William Albrecht is a Catholic apologist and takes the position that the New Mass IS valid. It is recommended you download the Validity of the New Mass Debate with Dimond vs. Albrecht if you haven't heard this debate first. That was the debate that caused Peter Dimond to inadvertently reject statements from Trent and the Church Fathers! This debate takes a completely different course and is a more fruitful-charitable dialogue. To download the complete debate right click and save the files below.
Right click to download the debate on this same topic vs. Peter Dimond below.
Right click to save the debate vs. Ken Bird on the Validity of the New Mass below!
Monday, April 19, 2010
Debating the Validity of the New Mass-again!

This past Saturday I debated Ken Bird on the validity of the New Mass once again. The MP3 audio is edited and ready to be released. It will be out by Monday evening, with an Afterthoughts also. The debate was very interesting and I think it described just how bankrupt the Sedevacantist position really is. Ken Bird was a true gentleman. Ken Bird attends a CMRI service and aligns themselves with them more than with the mindset of the Dimonds. Both groups are radical Sedevacantists--but the Dimonds rely on scare tactics and pejorative argumentation rather than fruitful charitable dialogue. Ken seemed to have misunderstood many points. In our examination of the debate we will see how Ken's adoption of Patrick Omlor's flawed theology has lead him down a murky path. A number of fallacious arguments Ken put forth(not his own fault wholly) are the outrageous claim that Florence "infallibly" defined the consecration formula. Ken also put forth arguments in regards to the UNION of the Faithful, arguments that were rebutted and left Ken with little else to say in regards to this. As evinced once more, the falsely called traditionalists were unable to deal with the Patristic sources. In my previous debate against Peter Dimond, Peter resorted to rejecting Church Father quotations as SPURIOUS since it was so damaging to his position!
Peter Dimond rejects the Fathers and Trent's definitions!
This time around Ken didn't reject the Fathers, but he failed to deal with them completely! What still stands is the peculiar little tradition that stems from the APOSTOLIC FATHERS-that the transubstantiation is brought about by 'THIS IS MY BODY' and 'THIS IS MY BLOOD' or a like wise affirmation of such a reality being put forth. These arguments don't get rebutted by Ken because it's impossible for a Sedevacantist who holds to the Invalidity of the New Mass to deal with the Patristic sources. The debate ranges at around 4 hours and covers a great deal of topics!
Ken Bird and I have agreed to do a number of debates in the near future as well!
Our next few debates will be announced soon!
GOD BLESS you!
Tuesday, April 13, 2010
Turretinfan vs. Francis Turretin

In our recent debate on Sola Scriptura(LEFT CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FULL DEBATE in MP3 Format! The Sola Scriptura Debate here!), Turretinfan found himself in a bind. When cross examined on whether or not Francis Turretin(the real Turretin) was not in UNITY with Turretinfan on the topic of Mary remaining a perpetual virgin throughout her life, Turretinfan scrambled so much so that he was forced(in order to not answer in the affirmative that Sola Scriptura has caused disunity between him and his hero) to say that Francis Turretin's views on Mary's Perpetual Virginity were taken from Tradition and NOT from Scripture! That's interesting. A GREAT Reformer came to a conclusion based on Sacred Tradition and NOT upon the Scriptures themselves? That makes for an INTERESTING case against Sola Scriptura in and of itself. But what interests us even more is that Turretinfan was wrong about Francis Turretin. When Francis Turretin points out how the EARLY Church believed Mary remained a perpetual virgin. he is referencing the early Fathers as a whole(not just Jerome as Tfan said). Hence he says that it is, "..piously believed with human faith from the consent of the ancient church" It is TRUE that Francis Turretin's final conclusion on this view is NOT EXPRESSLY from Scripture. But what interests us even more is that Francis Turretin's DEFENSE of the arguments levied against Mary having LOST her virginity is a defense completely relying on Scripture! Francis Turretin relies on SOLA SCRIPTURA in his refutation of the arguments put forth to "disprove" Mary had remained a virgin her whole life. In fact, Francis Turretin uses no less than 10 verses of Sacred Scripture to show the folly of those that attempt to prove Mary lost her virginity. Turretinfan could not and WOULD not affirm that Sola Scriptura had caused DISUNITY and DIVISION amongst himself and his hero--the REAL Turretin--on this issue. But the proof is there for everyone to see. Read below!
“This is not expressly declared in Scripture, but is yet piously believed with human faith from the consent of the ancient church. Thus it is probable that the womb in which our Savior received the auspices of life (whence he entered into this world, as from a temple) was so consecrated and sanctified by so great a guest that she always remained untouched by man; nor did Joseph ever cohabit with her. Hence Helvidius and the Antidicomarianites (so-called because they were opponents of [antidikoi] Mary)are deservedly rebuked by the fathers for denying that Mary was always a virgin (aei Parthenon). They held that she cohabited with Joseph after delivery; yea, also bore children from him. As Augustine remarks, they rely on the shallowest arguments, i.e., because Christ is called the ‘firstborn’ of Mary (cf. De Haeresibus 56, 84 [PL 42.40, 46]). For as Jerome well remarks, she was so called because no one was begotten before him, not because there was another after him. Hence among lawyers: ‘He is the first whom no one precedes; he is last, whom no one follows.’ The Hebrews were accustomed to call the firstborn also only begotten; Israel is called ‘the first-born of God’ (Ex 4:22), although the only people chosen of God. Thus ‘the firstborn’ is said to be ‘holy unto God’ (Ex 13:2), who first opened the womb, whether others followed or not. Otherwise the firstborn would not have to be redeemed until after another offspring had been procreated (the law shows this to be false because it commands it to be redeemed a month after birth, Num. 18:16). Not more solidly have they been able to elicit this from the fact that in the New Testament certain ones are called ‘the brothers of Christ.’ It is common in Scripture not only for one’s own and full brothers by nature to be designated by this name, but also blood relatives and cousins (as Abraham and Lot, Jacob and Laban). Thus James and Joses, Simon and Judas are called brothers of Christ (Mt. 13:55) by a relation of blood. For Mary (who is called their mother by Matthew and Mark) is called by John the sister of the Lord’s mother. However what is said in Jn. 7:5 that ‘neither did his brethren believe him’ must be understood of more remote blood relations. Nor is it derived better from this-that Joseph is said ‘not to have known Mary till she had brought forth her firstborn son’ (Mt. 1:25). The particles ‘till” and ‘even unto’ are often referred only to the past, not to the future (i.e., they so connote the preceding time, concerning which there might be a doubt or which it was of the highest importance to know, as not to have a reference to the future-cf. Gen 28:15; Pss 122:2; 110:1; Mt.28:20, etc.). Thus is shown what was done by Joseph before the nativity of Christ (to wit, that he abstained form her); but it does not imply that he lived with her in any other way postpartum. When therefore she is said to have been found with child ‘before they came together’ (prin e synelthein autous), preceding copulation is denied, but not subsequent affirmed. Although copulation had not take place in that marriage, it did not cease to be true and ratified (although unconsummated) for not intercourse, but consent makes marriage. Therefore it was perfect as to form (to wit, undivided conjunction of life and unviolated faith, but not as to end (to wit, the procreation of children, although it was not deficient as to the raising of the offspring.” Institutes of Elenctic Theology, vol. 2, 345-346.
I recommend anyone that has some cash to spare to get this set of the real Turretin. It's worth a browse at the least.
http://www.amazon.com/

GOD BLESS!
Saturday, April 10, 2010
the SOLA SCRIPTURA Debate!

Turretinfan vs. William Albrecht
Moderator: Lane Chaplin
Debate today!
Does Sola Scriptura Cause Division and Disunity within the Christian Body?
I will be debating Turretinfan this day on this very important topic. Hopefully we'll have the mp3 audio done real fast. I think this is a very interesting topic. I have a few more upcoming debates that I'll try and find the time to announce real soon. I'll also be appearing on a Mexican radio show in two weeks in a talk about Mary! Pray for myself and for all the Christ lovers out there. GOD BLESS!
Sunday, March 28, 2010
Vatican Lutheran Joint Declaration

The Vatican/Lutheran Joint Declaration on Justification is a famous document that the "traditionalists" and Sedevacantists spend much time attacking. It is a wonder if any of them have actually read the document. This PDF below examines the truckload of errors made by a Sedevacantist cult in their attempt to malign the Church and misrepresent the document.
Right click and save as!
VATICAN/LUTHERAN JOINT DECLARATION EXAMINED!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



